Calling all cumstains (that means you Slick Labia)

Keep your petty flamewars here kids. Any conversation from another forum area that degenerates into pathetic bickering will be moved here also.
User avatar
TSJ
Desperately Bored Loser
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Cyberspace

Post by TSJ » Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:59 am

cdoublejj wrote:Hey if they have there clothes off. assuming you turned safe search off
Just because it is possible to find pictures of people without clothes on,
on the web, then it isn't nessecerily the same thing as quaility porn.

User avatar
Venomous
Site Admin
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Social Deviancy
Contact:

Post by Venomous » Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:33 am

TSJ wrote:Just because it is possible to find pictures of people without clothes on, on the web, then it isn't nessecerily the same thing as quaility porn.
Amen... in fact, it's quite distinctly very much NOT the same thing...
- Venomous -

The internet is a tool, and so are most of the people who use it...

Social Deviancy

Slick-Labia

Post by Slick-Labia » Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:14 pm

I've been known on occaision to do a google-image when I'm after a quick-fix for some softcore and I can't bear to go over the old collection.

Every now and then, I'll have to switch the stupid safety feature back off..

For softcore, often I'll enjoy trawling those image hosting and social network sites, but will often give up in frustration due the annoying page layouts etc..
I wish those sites were as easy as sicking a download manager onto some TGP links...

User avatar
Venomous
Site Admin
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Social Deviancy
Contact:

Post by Venomous » Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 pm

Slick-Labia wrote:I wish those sites were as easy as sicking a download manager onto some TGP links...
-> PicaLoader <-

I used to use PixWeb, but a) it largely sucked; b) the company went ass-up and somebody else bought out all their products and fucked them up, and; c) PicaLoader kicks ass over it anyway.

You feed it your base URL, and your criteria (only images over a certain size, only such-and-such file formats, no duplicates, and so on) and it just reaps and reaps until it cannae reap na more.

If you give it free reign with how many directories/domains/levels it can cross in its search, you can fill a hard drive overnight. Scary.
- Venomous -

The internet is a tool, and so are most of the people who use it...

Social Deviancy

Slick-Labia

Post by Slick-Labia » Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:28 pm

Dude,
thanks for the tip.

User avatar
seajayjay
Chronic Spammer
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:17 am
Location: Cardboard box

Post by seajayjay » Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:58 pm

Take a naked girl then let your imagination go wild i can do it with out nay pr0n at all.

User avatar
Venomous
Site Admin
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Social Deviancy
Contact:

Post by Venomous » Mon Nov 20, 2006 6:37 am

cdoublejj wrote:Take a naked girl then let your imagination go wild i can do it with out nay pr0n at all.
Well, that's certainly something I didn't need to know.

Two things though, since you insisted on mentioning it:-

a) You're a virgin. Your imagination is vast because you've done nothing.

b) You're young and healthy. We're old and dried up and broken. Sometimes old men like us need visual aids to get the juices flowing. You'll see someday.

Anyways, let's not talk about your masturbation habits anymore. This thread suddenly makes my skin crawl. =P
- Venomous -

The internet is a tool, and so are most of the people who use it...

Social Deviancy

User avatar
TSJ
Desperately Bored Loser
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Cyberspace

Post by TSJ » Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:56 pm

Venomous wrote:
cdoublejj wrote:Take a naked girl then let your imagination go wild i can do it with out nay pr0n at all.
Well, that's certainly something I didn't need to know.

Two things though, since you insisted on mentioning it:-

a) You're a virgin. Your imagination is vast because you've done nothing.

b) You're young and healthy. We're old and dried up and broken. Sometimes old men like us need visual aids to get the juices flowing. You'll see someday.

Anyways, let's not talk about your masturbation habits anymore. This thread suddenly makes my skin crawl. =P
I think I know why he so easily can imagine a naked girl.. nuff said ;)

Supernovae
Desperately Bored Loser
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:42 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by Supernovae » Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:10 am

TSJ wrote:I think I know why he so easily can imagine a naked girl.. nuff said ;)
Well, I don't. So, please explain it to me.

CdoubleJJ does not strike anyone here as being the type of person to have gone down on a girl, nor has he physically seen, in the flesh, any body parts that are usually covered with undergarments.

Unless, you are talking about his male friend, which I am sure he has seen, felt, masterbated to, etc. And this normally doesn't constitute as having gone down on a female.

So, again, I ask you. How can you justify that CJJs imagination exceeds that average male when he has never done anything with a girl in his life?
A deviant mind at rest has no function here.

Slick-Labia

Post by Slick-Labia » Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:41 am

Supernovae wrote:
TSJ wrote:I think I know why he so easily can imagine a naked girl.. nuff said ;)
Well, I don't. So, please explain it to me.

CdoubleJJ does not strike anyone here as being the type of person to have gone down on a girl, nor has he physically seen, in the flesh, any body parts that are usually covered with undergarments.

Unless, you are talking about his male friend, which I am sure he has seen, felt, masterbated to, etc. And this normally doesn't constitute as having gone down on a female.

So, again, I ask you. How can you justify that CJJs imagination exceeds that average male when he has never done anything with a girl in his life?
I'm not certain, but I thought the implication made was that CJJ has girl-parts.

I'd confirm or deny this,
but I can never seem to find the motivaton to venture beyond the wide-open little mouth or semi-tight balloon-knot.

Both feel deliciously androgenous to me.

Typically after I'm done, I'll kick him/her to the street for the night.
Might as well be out earnin' me $$$.

User avatar
TSJ
Desperately Bored Loser
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Cyberspace

Post by TSJ » Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:22 pm

Slick-Labia wrote:
Supernovae wrote:
TSJ wrote:I think I know why he so easily can imagine a naked girl.. nuff said ;)
Well, I don't. So, please explain it to me.

CdoubleJJ does not strike anyone here as being the type of person to have gone down on a girl, nor has he physically seen, in the flesh, any body parts that are usually covered with undergarments.

Unless, you are talking about his male friend, which I am sure he has seen, felt, masterbated to, etc. And this normally doesn't constitute as having gone down on a female.

So, again, I ask you. How can you justify that CJJs imagination exceeds that average male when he has never done anything with a girl in his life?
I'm not certain, but I thought the implication made was that CJJ has girl-parts.

I'd confirm or deny this,
but I can never seem to find the motivaton to venture beyond the wide-open little mouth or semi-tight balloon-knot.

Both feel deliciously androgenous to me.

Typically after I'm done, I'll kick him/her to the street for the night.
Might as well be out earnin' me $$$.
Hehe.. well I was implying that his "parts" might be so small or deformed
that it looks quite similar...
0 what 1 and what 0

User avatar
Venomous
Site Admin
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Social Deviancy
Contact:

Post by Venomous » Tue Dec 12, 2006 2:37 pm

Slick-Labia wrote:I'm not certain, but I thought the implication made was that CJJ has girl-parts.
TSJ wrote:Hehe.. well I was implying that his "parts" might be so small or deformed that it looks quite similar...
While I'm not adverse to the spreading of the rumor that CJJ's peepee may be so microscopically small that at a hesitant glance, one might mistake it for there being no penis present at all, and ergo, may unwittingly assume, pending further investigation, that it must indeed be a vagina, I must protest, as a heterosexual male, the implication that CJJ's genitalia is in fact, in a literal sense, a vagina. This I would consider a heinous insult to the wonders of the female reproductive organs, and would pose significant discomfort to myself and other straight men when pondering the supposition that CJJ shares the same private parts as the nubile young girls we so enjoy. The concept, in whole, revolts me.

However, as mentioned, the accusation that his genitals, whilst assertedly NOT actually a literal vagina, could be mistaken for one due to a distinctly unmanly size and shape, is one I am not morally in opposition to. >=)
- Venomous -

The internet is a tool, and so are most of the people who use it...

Social Deviancy

User avatar
TSJ
Desperately Bored Loser
Posts: 261
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:21 am
Location: Cyberspace

Post by TSJ » Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:54 pm

rofl.. damn.. this place cracks me up :) actually.. my post :

"I think I know why he so easily can imagine a naked girl.. nuff said ;)",
could also be understood as ironi (danish humor).

Allthough the original ideer, was as slick labia stated.
Venomous wrote: While I'm not adverse to the spreading of the rumor that CJJ's peepee may be so microscopically small that at a hesitant glance, one might mistake it for there being no penis present at all, and ergo, may unwittingly assume, pending further investigation, that it must indeed be a vagina, I must protest, as a heterosexual male, the implication that CJJ's genitalia is in fact, in a literal sense, a vagina. This I would consider a heinous insult to the wonders of the female reproductive organs, and would pose significant discomfort to myself and other straight men when pondering the supposition that CJJ shares the same private parts as the nubile young girls we so enjoy. The concept, in whole, revolts me.
Rofl... that being said, I dont think any creature would want to take any part in the "futher investigation".

I see your protest on the behalf of all men,
and I must say that you are right, suggesting that cjj's private parts are exactly simular to that of a girls is indeed blasphemy :)
Venomous wrote: However, as mentioned, the accusation that his genitals, whilst assertedly NOT actually a literal vagina, could be mistaken for one due to a distinctly unmanly size and shape, is one I am not morally in opposition to. >=)
Now this is what I meant :) Then taking into account what cjj might have heard about vaginas and his lacking ability to find hardcore porn online,
his equipment in his mind might indeed be quite similar to that of a girls.

Assuming of course, that his school doesnt have a "birds and the bees" class that show actual private parts.

Maybe slick labia should send him some pictures of various private parts,
just to show him how it all looks :)
0 what 1 and what 0

User avatar
Venomous
Site Admin
Posts: 1573
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Social Deviancy
Contact:

Post by Venomous » Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:44 am

[Previous post very firmly deleted.]

Slick-Labia, consider yourself well and fucking truly on report. You have been warned, dude. Time passed does not dilute my vehemence about what you were told. Last warning: DO NOT FUCKING POST COCK PHOTOS ON THIS WEBSITE.

And TSJ, don't fuckin' encourage the pervert. I don't wanna see pictures of cock on my forum, whether it's considered on-topic or not. Although to be fair, you did specify to send them to CJJ, you never suggested posting them on the forum, so no blame for this is on you.

Still, everybody, we know Slick-Labia is hot for cock, so please don't even say "penis" and "pictures" in any thread he's posting in - I'm sick of having to delete all his posts!! =/
- Venomous -

The internet is a tool, and so are most of the people who use it...

Social Deviancy

Slick-Labia

Post by Slick-Labia » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:44 am

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest